Shamanism as the Original Neurotheology
Neurotheology is the idea that spiritual experiences and beliefs have a basis in neurological structures and processes (2010, 2019). Scientific explanation of consciousness must integrate biological and phenomenological approaches to develop neuroepistemological perspectives that integrate scientific information with philosophical assessments of evidence from experience. Neurophenomenological approaches provide unifying perspective on consciousness by linking brain functions with qualities of experience. A biogenetic structural perspective accepts both mind and brain as inherent structures of the human organism, providing two different views of reality–spiritual and physical–both of which are fundamentally symbolic (1996).
A biological foundation for shamanic epistemology is indicated by a cross-cultural shamanic cosmology which indicates its basis in biogenetic features rather than arbitrary cultural beliefs (2010, 2013). Brain research and cognitive science help us understand these features by linking the phenomenal qualities of ASC experiences with associated biological structures, functions and processes. Shamanism A Biopsychosocial Paradigm of Consciousness and Healing presents shamanism as the original neurotheology and a reflection of our neuropsychology. Many features of shamanic cosmology reflect brain functions, especially activation and integrated operation of innate cognitive modules (2019a, 2018), as exemplified in humans with animal powers and animals with human-like capacities (2019b).
Biological foundations of consciousness and the self are revealed in the shamanic ASC referred to as “soul journey” (out-of-body experiences) which have a nearly universal distribution that reflects a basis in neurognosis. These kinds of experiences reflect interference with the normal integration of basic brain functions, producing a dislocation of the experiential self and visual field from the physical body (2019b). These higher cognitive functions process information in distal space and time, a projection of consciousness.
The body image of soul flight reflects body-based representational systems (2013). The body is a neurological basis for human knowing and a principal metaphor used in analogical thinking. Body metaphors express meanings by mediating among sensory domains, employing mimesis to represent through action, cross-modal translations that are at the foundation of symbolic thought. The experiences of oneself as a soul-like entity reflect self-awareness and modeling that extends beyond primitive bodily processes and transcends the present moment. This capacity for mental time travel reflects selection for mental processing of future predictions and decision-making.
Neurognostic effects produced by psychedelics and other ASC share similarities (2017), including activation of both the serotonergic and dopaminergic systems. This amplifies the phylogenetic older brain structures and the excitability of limbic and cortical structures. These central neuroepistemic effects produce an ascendence of information from the evolutionary ancient brain involving primary processing. These functions provide emotional information, behavioral communication, and a sense of self crucial to our sense of knowing what is true.
Central to shamanic epistemology are visionary forms that constitute a presentational symbolism (2017, 2018). This internally derived information are symbols interpreted as a spiritual world used as a reference system to evaluate self and others and re-program neurognostic structures with mythological interpretative systems (2010) by integration of innate processing modules for the natural world (animal species), self-representation and social references (2019b).
Enhanced forms of cognitive integration and extra-personal cognition experienced as spirit presences reflect integration of innate structures of self and psyche (2019a). The evolution of the shamanic capacity involved extensions for knowing with understandings of other minds (divination), new forms of self (power animals) and new social referents (spirits, gods) that reflect activation of innate intelligences and illustrate features of a shamanic neuroepistemology (2019d). Symbolic processes are at the basis of spirit experiences and beliefs that constitute social others—the basis of conscience and consciousness (2004).
SELECTED PUBLICATIONS
2019a
The supernatural as innate cognitive operators. In P. Craffert, J. Baker and M.J. Winkelman (eds.) The Supernatural After the Neuro-turn (pp. 89-106). ResearchGate link.2019b
Shamanic alterations of consciousness as sources of supernatural experiences. In P. Craffert, J. Baker and M.J. Winkelman (eds.) The Supernatural After the Neuro-turn. p. 127-147. ResearchGate link.2019c
The Supernatural After the Neuro-Turn (eds. P. Craffert, J. Baker and M.J.Winkelman). ResearchGate link. Publisher link.2019d
The evolutionary neuroanthropology of consciousness : exploring the diversity of conscious states across cultures. An interview with Michael Winkelman. ALIUS Bulletin, 3, 45-97. (Winkelman, M. & Fortier, M.E.) doi: 10.34700/krg3-zk35 ResearchGate link.2018
An ontology of psychedelic entity experiences in evolutionary psychology and neurophenomenology. Journal of Psychedelic Studies. 2(1): 5-23. DOI: 10.1556/2054.2018.002 ResearchGate link.2017a
Mechanisms of psychedelic visionary experiences: Hypotheses from evolutionary psychology. Front Neurosci. 11, article 539. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00539 ResearchGate link.2017b
Shamanism and the brain. In Clements, N.K. (ed.) Religion: Mental religion (pp. 355-372). MacMillan Interdisciplinary handbooks. USA: MacMillan. ResearchGate link.2016
Ethnological and Neurophenomenological Approaches to Religious Experiences. In: B. Schmidt, ed. The Study of Religious Experience Approaches and Methodologies. Bristol, CT: Equiox Publishing, Pp. 33-51. ResearchGate link.2015
Shamanism as a biogenetic structural paradigm for humans’ evolved social psychology. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 7(4):267-277. ResearchGate link. doi:10.1037/rel00000342013
Shamanic Cosmology as an Evolutionary Neurocognitive Epistemology. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 32(1), 2013, pp. 79-99. ResearchGate link.2010
Shamanism: A biopsychosocial paradigm of consciousness and healing. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO (Second Edition). ResearchGate link. Publisher Link2009
Shamanism and the Origins of Spirituality and Ritual Healing. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 3(4):458-489. Researchgate link.2006
Cross-cultural Assessments of Shamanism as a Biogenetic Foundation for Religion. In: Patrick McNamara, ed. Where God and Science Meet: How Brain and Evolutionary Studies Alter Our Understanding of Religion. Pp. 139-159. Westport, CT: Praeger. ResearchGate link2004
Spirits as Human Nature and the Fundamental Structures of Consciousness. In: From Shaman to Scientist Essays on Humanity’s Search for Spirits, J. Houran, ed. Lanham, MD.: Scarecrow Press. Pp. 59-96. ResearchGate link.2004
Shamanism as the Original Neurotheology. Zygon 39(1):193-217. Researchgate link.2003
The Shamanic Paradigm: A Biogenetic Structuralist Approach. Reply to Reviews of Michael Winkelman’s Shamanism. The Neural Ecology of Consciousness and Healing in the Journal of Ritual Studies Book Review Forum, Vol 18(1): 119-128. ResearchGate link.2002b
Shamanic Universals and Evolutionary Psychology. Journal of Ritual Studies. 16(2): 63-76. ResearchGate link.2002c
Shamanism as Neurotheology and Evolutionary Psychology. American Behavioral Scientist. 45(12): 1873-1885. ResearchGate link.1996
Neurophenomenology and Genetic Epistemology as a Basis for the Study of Consciousness. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 19(3):217-236. ResearchGate link.1996
Psychointegrator Plants: Their Roles in Human Culture and Health. Introduction to: Sacred Plants, Consciousness and Healing Cross-Cultural and Interdisciplinary Perspectives Yearbook of Cross-cultural Medicine and Psychotherapy Volume 6. Michael Winkelman and Walter Andritzky, eds. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 9-53. ResearchGate link.